Ecological vulnerability Assessment in the Heilongjiang-Amur River Transboundary Basin

Authors

  • Wang Xinyuan Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7248-3725
  • Cheng Hao Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Li Fujia Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • Dashtseren Avirmed Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 15170, Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4119-5345
  • Ganzey Kirill Pacific Geographical Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok 690041, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4697-5255

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/mjgg.v62i46.4064

Keywords:

Ecological vulnerability assessment, Heilongjiang-Amur River Basin, CRITIC-AHP framework, Transboundary basin

Abstract

The Heilongjiang–Amur River Basin (HARB) is an important transboundary basin in Northeast Asia, characterized by complex and diverse ecosystems and facing significant environmental pressures. Assessing ecological vulnerability in this region is of great importance. This study adopts the Exposure–Sensitivity–Adaptive capacity (ESA) framework and applies the CRITIC–AHP weighting method to evaluate the spatial pattern of ecological vulnerability (EVI) in HARB in 2020 and identify its main influencing factors. The results show that the overall ecological vulnerability of the basin is relatively high, the average EVI in 2020 was 31.0. Areas with high vulnerability are mainly concentrated in the Gobi region of Mongolia, the Northeast China Plain, and parts of southern Russia. Soil retention, net primary productivity (NPP), and habitat quality index (HQI) are the key factors contributing to the spatial variation of EVI, which explained 63%, 42% and 40% of the variation, respectively. The Mongolian part of the basin shows relatively higher ecological vulnerability, which reflects the significant influence of arid climate and fragile land resources. These findings provide a scientific basis for ecological vulnerability management and transboundary cooperation in the HARB, and offer useful reference for developing sustainable ecological strategies in other transboundary river basins.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
124
PDF
57

Author Biography

Wang Xinyuan, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

References

[1] T. Bao, G. Jia, and X. Xu, "Wetland heterogeneity determines methane emissions: a pan-arctic synthesis," Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 10152–10163, 2021, Available: doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01616

[2] M. A. Beroya-Eitner, "Ecological vulnerability indicators," Ecological Indicators, vol. 60, pp. 329–334, 2016, Available: doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.001

[3] IPCC, "Technical summary," in Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, K. S. White, Q. K. Ahmad, and Q. Anisimov, Eds. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[4] B. Peng et al., "Ecological environment vulnerability and driving force of Yangtze River urban agglomeration," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 23, Art. no. 6623, 2019, Available: doi: 10.3390/su11236623

[5] Li, et al., "Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in mountainous region using remote sensing and GIS—A case study in the upper reaches of Minjiang River, China," Ecological Modelling, vol. 192, no. 1-2, pp. 175–187, 2006, Available: doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.005

[6] D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas, and L. Papayannakis, "Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 763–770, 1995, Available: doi: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H

[7] T. L. Saaty, "A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–281, 1977, Available: doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

[8] S. Jia, and Y. Yang, "Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving factors of land cover in the Heilongjiang (Amur) River Basin," Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 15, Art. no. 3730, 2023. Available: doi: 10.3390/rs15153730

[9] X. Luo, Y. Li, X. Ji, and D. He, "Research progress on hydrological geography of China’s international rivers," Acta Geographica Sinica, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 1703–1717, 2023.

[10] C. Dai, S. Wang, Z. Li, et al., "Review on hydrological geography research in the Heilongjiang River Basin," Acta Geographica Sinica, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 1823–1834, 2015.

[11] F. Zha, C. Liu, and R. Shi, "Elevation Cluster Dataset Covering the Amur River Basin," Global Change Data Repos, vol. 1, 2016. Available: doi: 10.3974/geodp.2017.02.11

[12] B. Yan et al., "Climate change detection and annual extreme temperature analysis of the amur river basin," Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2016, Art. no. 6268938, 2016, Available: doi: 10.1155/2016/6268938.

[13] X. Huggins, et al., "Hotspots for social and ecological impacts from freshwater stress and storage loss," Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 439, 2022, Available: doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28029-w

[14] J. Liu, et al., "Nexus approaches to global sustainable development," Nature Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 466–476, 2018. Available: doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8

[15] D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas, and L. Papayannakis, "Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 763–770, 1995, Available: doi: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.

[16] T. L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990, Available: doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.

[17] J. Zhong, et al., "Changes of ecological vulnerability in areas with different urban expansion patterns—A case study in the Yanhe river basin, China," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 370, p. 122607, 2024. Available: doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122607

[18] J. F. Wang, T. L. Zhang, and B. J. Fu, "A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity," Ecological Indicators, vol. 67, pp. 250–256, 2016, Available: doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.052.

[19] Y. Song, et al., "An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis: Cases with different types of spatial data," GIScience & Remote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 593–610, 2020, Available: doi: 10.1080/15481603.2020.1760434.

[20] D. Pimentel, et al., "Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits," Science, vol. 267, no. 5201, pp. 1117–1123, 1995, Available: doi: 10.1126/science.267.5201.1117.

[21] F. Jin, et al., "Effects of vegetation and climate on the changes of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau of China," Science of the Total Environment, vol. 773, p. 145514, 2021, Available: doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145514.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Xinyuan, W., Hao, C., Fujia, L., Avirmed, D., & Kirill, G. (2025). Ecological vulnerability Assessment in the Heilongjiang-Amur River Transboundary Basin. Mongolian Journal of Geography and Geoecology, 62(46), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.5564/mjgg.v62i46.4064