Plastic waste collection route optimization: Bulgan province

Authors

  • Enkhbaatar Dembereldash Erdenet Institute of Technology, Erdenet, Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-1277
  • Uyanga Batbaatar School of Engineering and Technology, National University of Mongolia
  • Enkhdul Tuuguu School of Engineering and Technology, National University of Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6147-2130
  • Sanchirgarav Batzorig Sustainable Plastic Recycling in Mongolia, EU SWITCH-ASIA project, Caritas Czech Republic in Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/mjgg.v62i46.4115

Keywords:

Waste generation rate, Solid waste management, TSP, VRP, MILP

Abstract

Efficient plastic waste collection in rural Mongolia is critical to reducing environmental pollution and improving recycling outcomes. This study optimizes plastic waste transport routes in Bulgan province using the travelling salesman problem (TSP), and vehicle routing problem (VRP) algorithms and open-source GIS tools. By analyzing population data, waste generation rates, and vehicle capacity, ten optimal routes were identified for 15-ton load serving 19 key locations. Results show large disparities in route efficiency, with urban centers generating more waste per kilometer than sparsely populated areas. Recommendations include dynamic routing, vehicle load capacity, and investing in local waste compacting equipment. The findings offer practical solutions for cost-effective, sustainable rural waste management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
115
PDF
60

References

[1] UNEP, Single-use plastics: A roadmap for sustainability, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/single-use-plastics-roadmap-sustainability

[2] OECD, Global Plastics Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. [Online]. Available: doi: 10.1787/de747aef-en.

[3] D. Vološinová and T. Fojtík, “Plastic recycling technology gap assessment report,” T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, p. r. i. Podbabská 30, 160 00 Praha 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.switch-asia.eu/site/assets/files/3300/20220222_plastic_report_eng.pdf

[4] The Asia Foundation, “Ulaanbaatar Household Waste Composition Study Report,” The Waste and Climate Change Project. Ulaanbaatar, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/ietc/resources/publication/ulaanbaatar-household-waste-composition-study-report

[5] P. Guerber, “Waste management baseline study in Khishig-Undur – Summary report,”, Khishig-Undur soum, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecosoum.org/_files/ugd/55e3ff_f0bf497d946b47e294532be392718ac6.pdf

[6] “Refuse garbage compactor truck,” Procompactor. [Online]. Available: https://www.procompactor.com/refuse-garbage-compactor-truck/?fbclid=IwAR3KKH7aMxWLcOWY4CcQQgmhnRDwFxWNPc4ovlC3kLr_nmlYDq1xk6iy94c.

[7] R. Future, “Summary Report; Material bulk densities,” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://wrap.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-02/WRAP-bulk-density-summary-report-Jan2010.pdf.

[8] Zilla, “Vehicle standards information 5- Vehicle dimension limits,”. [Online]. Available: https://authorzilla.com/jpg8/vehicle-standards-information-5-vehicle-dimension-limits.html?fbclid=IwAR3cww03sAVR3UEkyq8nqzI8lD-wlG2oZK2fRyvj4Fjocd8etRsvpMVE2PQ.

[9] S. A. M. Greco, D. G. Rossit, M. Frutos, and A. Cavallin, “Optimization of waste collection through the sequencing of micro-routes and transfer station convenience analysis: An Argentinian case study,” Waste Manag. & Res., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1267–1279, 2023. Available: doi: 10.1177/0734242X221139123.

[10] A. Shafik, M. Elkhedr, D. Said, and A. Hassan, “Environmental impacts of MSW collection route optimization using GIS: A case study of 10th of Ramadan City, Egypt,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2209.02652, 2022. [Online]. Available: doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2209.02652.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Dembereldash, E., Batbaatar, U., Tuuguu, E., & Batzorig, S. (2025). Plastic waste collection route optimization: Bulgan province. Mongolian Journal of Geography and Geoecology, 62(46), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.5564/mjgg.v62i46.4115