Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring and Arterial Blood Gas Exchange During Spinal vs General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Mongolian Parturient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2024.04.001Keywords:
Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure, General Anesthesia, Spinal Anesthesia, Cesarean Section, Arterial Blood GasAbstract
Objective: This study investigated the accuracy and precision of continuous, invasive blood pressure obtained using the arterial line system in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal and general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 150 parturient women who underwent C-sections from July 1, 2021, to Dec 30, 2023, were divided into two groups: the GA (general anesthesia) group (n=50) and the SA (spinal anesthesia) group (n=100). In this prospective observational study, we measured and compared the changes in hemodynamic fluctuation and arterial blood gas deviations under C-section with either spinal or general anesthesia. Results: One hundred fifty patients were recruited for the study after exclusions, and data were analyzed for 150 patients. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthesia to incision, the operation duration, infused crystalloid volume, blood loss, and urine output. The most frequent complications were surgery hypotension, tachycardia, nausea, and headache in the SA group, and tachycardia, hypertension, in the GA group These complications may cause SA’s impact on the sympathetic nerves, resulting in dilated blood vessels and reflex tachycardia. Conclusion: It has been suggested that the choice of anesthesia technique has a significant impact on hemodynamic stability during cesarean section.
Downloads
29
References
1. Vikhareva O, Rickle GS, Lavesson T, et al. Hysterotomy level at cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:438-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20184
2. WHO. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. 2021. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access#
3. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health Indicators. 2012. Published online 2012.
4. Huang CH, Hsieh YJ, Wei KH, et al. A comparison of spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015;53:7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2015.01.003
5. Juhani TP, Hannele H. Complications during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a clinical report of one year's experience. Reg Anesth. 1993;18:128-131.
6. Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The current role of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11:18-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6
7. Wang L, Liu C, Wang X, et al. The impact of general anesthesia on the outcomes of preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks delivered via cesarean section. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:136-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6
8. Humphries A, Mirjalili SA, Tarr GP, et al. Hemodynamic changes in women with symptoms of supine hypotensive syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:631-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13789
9. Butwick AJ, Coleman L, Cohen SE, et al. Minimum effective bolus dose of oxytocin during elective caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:338-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq004
10. Moghadam SHP, Pourparizi M, Mirzaei T, et al. Analgesic effect of preoperative intravenous administration of paracetamol on post-cesarean pain: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13:58-82. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-134316
11. Tihtonen K, Kööbi T, Yli-Hankala A, et al. Maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery assessed by whole-body impedance cardiography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:355-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00489.x
12. Ram M, Lavie A, Lev S, et al. Cardiac hemodynamics before, during and after elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in low-risk women. J Perinatol. 2017;37:793-799. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.53
13. Sung TY, Jee YS, You HJ, et al. Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021;16:49-55. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20072
14. Neuman MD, Sieber F, Dillane D. Comparative effectiveness research on spinal versus general anesthesia for surgery in older adults. Anesthesiol. 2023;139:211-223. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000004604
15. Rathmell JP, Avidan MS. Patient-centered outcomes after general and spinal anesthesia. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2088-2089. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme2116017
16. Pu X, Sun JM. General anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:149-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000014925
17. Ozden MGN, Koruk S, Collak Z, et al. Comparison of the effects of general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective analysis of data. North Clin Istanb. 2023;10:575-582. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.25593
18. Kim WH, Hur M, Park SK, et al. Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;37:5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.09.012
19. Chen Y, Liu W, Gong X, et al. Comparison of effects of general anesthesia and combined spinal/epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery on umbilical cord blood gas values: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:5272-5279. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.914160
20. Afolabi BB, Lesi FE. Regional versus general anesthesia for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:43-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004350.pub3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
