Performance of Ovarian Response Prediction Index As Predictor of Ovarian Response

Authors

  • Bolormaa Dagvadorj Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Nasantogtokh Erdenebileg Department of Infertility and Reproduction, National Center for Maternal and Child Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Enkhmaa Davaasuren Department of Infertility and Reproduction, National Center for Maternal and Child Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Altantuya Shirchinjav Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Enkhtsetseg Jamsranjav Department of Infertility and Reproduction, National Center for Maternal and Child Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Otgontsetseg Dagvadorj Department of Communication Skills, School of Biomedicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2022.06.007

Keywords:

Infertility Women, Ovarian Diseases, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Anti-mullerian Hormone, Fertilization

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate potential predictors of response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), including follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Estradiol, antral follicle count (AFC), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI). Methods: In this prospective, single center study, we recruited 55 infertile women underwent the first cycle of in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic injection/intrauterine insemination (IVF/ICSI/IUI). We measured serum FSH and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) level by ELISA and evaluated AFC. In accordance with formula, AMH x AFC / patient's age, ORPI was calculated. Results: The study participants are aged between 25 to 48 in infertility women. The mean age of the participants are 34.5 ± 5.5. The hormonal predictors, as well as ovarian response, are presented in Table 2. Predict ovarian hypo response by E2 and ORPI. Multivariable models improved the predictive accuracy for hypo-response (AUC > 0.6). With regard to the hyper-response, ORPI, E2 and AFC showed good predictors. In the multivariable model, the ORPI, E2 and AFC presented the best predictive accuracy, with an AUC 0.81, a sensitivity of 87 %, and a specificity of 67 %. Conclusion: ORPIndex is predicting the hyper-response more accurately than the ovarian hypo- response in infertility women. Participant’s ovarian reserve biomarkers (AFC and E level) was significantly increased predictive accuracy.

Abstract
66
PDF
25

Author Biographies

Bolormaa Dagvadorj, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Department of Infertility and Reproduction, National Center for Maternal and Child Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Altantuya Shirchinjav, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Department of Infertility and Reproduction, National Center for Maternal and Child Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Dagvadorj, B., Erdenebileg, N., Davaasuren, E., Shirchinjav, A., Jamsranjav, E., & Dagvadorj, O. (2022). Performance of Ovarian Response Prediction Index As Predictor of Ovarian Response. Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2022.06.007

Issue

Section

Articles