Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Standard Triple and Sequential Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Authors

  • Byambajav Tsogt-Ochir Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Oyuntsetseg Khasag Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Bira Namdag Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Erdenetsogt Dungubat Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Choijamts Gotov Otoch Manramba University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Sarantuya Tserenchimed Department of Internal Medicine, United Family Intermed Hospital, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Enkhtsetseg Altangerel Department of Laboratory, General Hospital of Defense and Law Enforcement, Ulaanbaatar Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2016.02.008

Keywords:

Helicobacter pylori, Disease Eradication

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness of sequential therapy to the standard triple therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in Mongolia. Methods: From September 2014 to February 2016, 140 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection (upper gastrointestinal tract (GI) endoscopy, rapid urease test, histology, H. pylori stool antigen test (HpStAg)) randomly received 10 days standard triple therapy (20 mg pantoprazole, 1 g amoxicillin, 500 mg clarithromycin, all twice daily for 10 days; STT group, n = 70), and sequential therapy (20 mg pantoprazole, 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 5 days followed by 20 mg pantoprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, 500 mg metronidazole twice daily for 5 days; SQT group, n = 70). Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as a negative HpStAg test 4 weeks after the end of eradication treatment. Results: The eradication rates by intention to treat (ITT) analysis were 71.4% (50/70) and 50% (35/70) in the STT and SQT groups, respectively (p = 0.033). The eradication rates by per-protocol (PP) analysis were 72.5% (50/69) and 51.5% (35/68) in the STT and SQT groups, respectively (p = 0.018). The adverse event rates were 7.6% (5/70) and 18.6% (13/70) in the STT and SQT groups, respectively (p = 0.043). Conclusion: The eradication rate was significantly higher in the STT group compared with the SQT group. But the eradication efficacies of both STT and SQT for H. pylori infection in Mongolia are unacceptable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
37
PDF
93

Downloads

Published

2016-11-25

How to Cite

Tsogt-Ochir, B., Khasag, O., Namdag, B., Dungubat, E., Gotov, C., Tserenchimed, S., & Altangerel, E. (2016). Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Standard Triple and Sequential Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication. Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2016.02.008

Issue

Section

Articles