The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation systems: The case of Mongolian information technology sector

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/pmas.v64i03.3795

Keywords:

sectoral innovation system, innovation intermediaries, Mongolia, software industry

Abstract

This paper analyses the types of innovation intermediaries that have emerged in Mongolia and investigates their roles within the information technology sector of the country. The study finds that diverse innovation intermediaries have emerged, and the majority of the intermediaries are non-sector specific, with only a few specializing in a single industry. The sector-specific intermediary plays a crucial role in building linkages and providing access to resources in sectoral innovation systems in developing countries. The study identifies several constraints related to funding and innovation policy support for these intermediaries. Consistent policy and financial support for sector-specific intermediary organizations could strengthen their role in the developing countries, particularly those with limited human and capital resources, such as Mongolia.

This study contributes to an important understanding of the roles of intermediaries in underdeveloped and newly developed immature innovation systems of developing countries with low income and limited resources. As for the innovation system of Mongolia, it is impending to strengthen the sector-specific intermediary organizations through government and budgetary support and training for specialized human resources. The study also provides valuable insights that can guide the future development of the industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
49
PDF
32

References

Sharif. N. “Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept,” Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jun. 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001.

The World Bank, Innovation Policy: A guide for Developing Countries. Washington DC: The World Bank, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8269-1.

Carlsson. B. Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0145-.5

Cooke. P, Gomez Uranga. M., and Etxebarria. G. “Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions,” Research Policy, vol. 26, no. 4–5, Art. no. 4–5, Dec. 1997, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.

Freeman. C. Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter, 1987.

Lundvall. B.-A. Ed., National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 1992.

Malerba. F. “Sectoral systems of innovation and production,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 247–264, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1

Nelson. R. National Innovation Systems: A comparative Analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Malerba. F. “Sectoral systems of innovation: basic concepts,” in Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe, F. Malerba, Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 9–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493270.002.

Bergek. A., Jacobsson. S, Carlsson. B, Lindmark. S., and Rickne. A. “Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis,” Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Apr. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.

Edquist. C. “Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges,” in The Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg and D. C. Mowery, Eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 182–208, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007.

Edquist. C. “Systems of innovation approaches-Their emergence and characteristics,” in Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, by Charles Edquist,. : Pinter Publishers, 1997, pp. 1–35.

Galli. R., and Teubal. M. “Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems,” in Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, by, C. Edquist, Ed., Pinter Publishers, 1997, pp. 342–370.

Hekkert. M. P., Suurs. R. A. A., Negro. S. O., Kuhlmann. S., and Smits. R. E. H. M. “Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 74, no. 4, Art. no. 4, May 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.

Lundvall. B.-A., Chaminade. C, Vang. J, and Joseph. K. Eds., Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803427.

Edquist. C. “Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures),” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1725–1753, Dec. 2011, https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr060.

Chunhavuthiyanon. M., and Intarakumnerd. P. “The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation system: The case of Thailand’s food industry,” International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–36, Mar. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.13.1.15_1.

Intarakumnerd. P., and Chaoroenporn. P. “The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: a case study of Thailand,” Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, vol. 21, no. sup2, pp. 99–114, Nov. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.819249.

Klerkx. L., Álvarez. R., and Campusano. R. “The emergence and functioning of innovation intermediaries in maturing innovation systems: the case of Chile,” Innovation and Development, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 73-91, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921268.

Klerkx. L, and Leeuwis .C. “Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 849-860, Jul. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001.

Germundsson. L.B., Frankelius. P., and Norrman. C., “The role of innovation intermediary organisations in forming value creating meetings: the agri-food firm perspective,” IFAM, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 993-1004, Oct. 2021, https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2020.0167

Batkhuyag. D., Sonintamir. N., Lodoiravsal. Ch., and Tsolmon., Z, “A Study on Mongolia’s National Innovation System: ICT as a Pilot Sector for the Innovation System Development,” World Technopolis Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 157-167, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2015.4.3.157.

MEDS, “The pilot community innovation survey of Mongolia” Ulaanbaatar, 2017.

Munkhuu. N. “Research on the possibility of innovation cluster development in Mongolia,” Doctoral dissertation, MUST, Ulaanbaatar, 2016.

Sonintamir. N., and Batkhuyag. D., Innovation environment and development strategy. Ulaanbaatar, 2021.

Oyuntsetseg. L. National Innovation System: Theoretical and methodological framework. Ulaanbaatar: MUST, 2019.

Howells. J. “Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation,” Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 715–728, Jun. 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.

Van Lente. H., Hekkert. M., Smits. R., and Van Waveren. B. “Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes,” Int. J. Innov. Mgt., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 247–279, Sep. 2003, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817.

Malerba. F. “Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 63–82, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688.

Bessant. J., and Rush.H. “Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer,” Research Policy, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 97–114, Jan. 1995, https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-E.

Howard Partners, “Study of the Role of Intermediaries in Support of Innovation,” 2007. [Online]. Available: https://howardpartners.com.au/projects-science-research-innovation/

State Great Hural, “Innovation Law” State Information Journal, vol. 741, no. 24, pp. 1473–1498, 2012.

State Great Hural, “‘VISION-2050’ Long-term Development Policy of Mongolia,” State Information Journal, vol. 1127, no. 25, pp. 1245–1304, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

Dashdondov, B., Nergui, S., Choimaa, L., Ganzorig, O., & Purevjav, N. (2024). The role of intermediaries in sectoral innovation systems: The case of Mongolian information technology sector. Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, 64(03), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.5564/pmas.v64i03.3795

Issue

Section

Articles