Central Asia as a Continental Bridge or Thucydides Trap?

Authors

  • Udo B. Barkmann

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/mjia.v25i1.3614

Keywords:

Central Asia, US-Chinese Relations, Silk Road

Abstract

When the Western press and media report on Xinjiang, they tend to focus on the situation of the Uyghurs in this autonomous region of China. The fact that Xinjiang is of the highest strategic importance for China as a raw materials base, gateway to Central Asia and starting point of the New Silk Road, which is orientated towards Europe, and that real geopolitics is all about precisely these things, is often neglected. Of course, the starting point of the New Silk Road is in the strategists' crosshairs and it goes without saying that Central Asia and the South Caucasus are also targeted. After all, the shortest transport corridors to Europe run through these areas, now that the transport routes via Russia have been cancelled by Russia's war in Ukraine. This is where the Chinese New Silk Road and the European Global Gateway meet. What is the situation in Central Asia? What role does the International Trans-Caspian Transport Route play? How are China, the USA and Europe acting where the future of the New Silk Road is ultimately at stake? This article aims to provide a few answers to these questions, which should therefore only be understood as an approach to the topic of "Central Asia as a continental bridge or Thucydides' trap?".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
123
PDF
55

Author Biography

Udo B. Barkmann

Ph.D, Professor, Head of the German Studies Center of Mongolia

Downloads

Published

2024-10-08

How to Cite

B. Barkmann, U. (2024). Central Asia as a Continental Bridge or Thucydides Trap?. Mongolian Journal of International Affairs, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5564/mjia.v25i1.3614

Issue

Section

Articles