Output index is important to the measurement of public service productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69588/mjer.v28i17.3485Keywords:
Productivity, public service productivity, productivity measurement, quality adjustmentAbstract
Measuring the effectiveness of treatment in terms of service quality rather than price increases is important to increase the validity of service productivity measurements.
Researchers attribute low productivity growth in healthcare to productivity measurement. This is because most of the increase in healthcare productivity is not cost reduction, but quality improvement. After all, indicators such as switching from inpatient to outpatient care are not included in the productivity measurement.
Measurement of treatment outcomes and quality is one of the major challenges in measuring the productivity of health services. Measuring the effectiveness of treatment after a certain period by the quality of service, rather than by price increases, would increase the validity of service productivity measurements.
Measuring productivity in healthcare without quality indicators reduces the validity of the measurement. Therefore, quality-adjusted measurement of healthcare productivity is important to account for objective outcomes.
Төрийн үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийн хэмжилтэд гарцын индекс чухал болох нь
Эмчилгээний үр нөлөөг үнийн өсөлтөөр биш, үйлчилгээний чанараар хэмжих нь үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийн хэмжилтийн бодит байдлыг нэмэгдүүлэх чухал ач холбогдолтой.
Cудлаачид эрүүл мэндийн салбарын бүтээмжийн өсөлт бага байгаа шалтгааныг бүтээмжийн хэмжилттэй холбож тайлбарладаг. Эрүүл мэндийн үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийн өсөлтийн ихэнхи хувийг өртгийн бууралт биш харин чанарын сайжруулалт эзэлдэг нь хэвтэн эмчлүүлэгчээс амбулаторийн эмчилгээнд шилжих зэрэг үзүүлэлтийг бүтээмжийн хэмжилтэнд тооцдоггүйтэй холбоотой.
Эмчилгээний үр дүн, чанарын хэмжилт нь эрүүл мэндийн үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийг хэмжихэд тулгардаг томоохон бэрхшээлүүдийн нэг юм. Тодорхой хугацааны дараах эмчилгээний үр нөлөөг үнийн өсөлтөөр биш, үйлчилгээний чанараар хэмжих нь үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийн хэмжилтийн бодит байдлыг нэмэгдүүлэх ач холбогдолтой. Эрүүл мэндийн салбарын бүтээмжийн хэмжилтийг чанарын үзүүлэлтгүй тооцох нь хэмжилтийн бодит байдлыг багасгадаг. Тиймээс, эрүүл мэндийн үйлчилгээний бүтээмжийг чанарын тохируулгатай хэмжих нь үр дүнг бодитой тооцох ач холбогдолтой.
Түлхүүр үг:
Бүтээмж, төрийн үйлчилгээний бүтээмж, бүтээмжийн хэмжилт, чанарын тохируулга
Downloads
48
References
НОМ ЗҮЙ
A.Ghobadian & T.Husband. (1990). Measuring Total Productivity using Production Functions. International Journal of Production Research, 1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549008942803
Bradley, R. (2013). Feasible methods to estimate disease based price indexes. Journal of Health Economics, 32(3), 504-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.01.005
C. Ammer and Ammer D.S. (1984). Dictionary of Business and Economics. Macmillan.
C.Schultze C.Mackie. (2002). At What Price?: Conceptualizing and Measuring Cost-of-Living and Price Indexes. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
Chew, W. B. (1986). Productivity and Change: The Short-Term Effects of Investment on Factory Level Productivity. Harvard University, PhD dissertation thesis, University Microfilms International, , 161.
Craig C.E and Harris C.R. (1973). Total Productivity.
Diane Dawson, Huge Gravelle, et all. (2005). Developing new approaches to measuring NHS outputs and productivity. Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Dunn, A. Eli L., Sarah P., A.H. Shapiro. (2013). Medical Care Price Indexes for Patients with Employer‐Provided Insurance: Nationally Representative Estimates from MarketScan Data. Health Services Research, 48(3), 1173-1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12008
el, Rosen A. Cutler D. at. (2017). Strengthening national data to better measure what we are buying in health care: reconciling national health expenditures with detailed survey data. NBER. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23290
Fenton, E. H. (1985). Company Productivity Measurement and Usage in Theory and Practice. Pace University, PhD dissertation thesis, University Microfilms International, 296 .
Grunberg, T. (2004). Performance Improvement towards a Method for Finding and Prioritizing Potential Performance Improvement Areas in Manufacturing Operations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410509969
Malinovskaya A, Sheiner L. (2016). Measuring productivity in healthcare: an analysis of the literature. Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings, 4.
Mohanty, R. P. & Rastogi, S. C. . (1986). An Action Research Approach to Productivity Measurement . International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(2) , 47 - 61. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054759
OECD. (2001). Measuring Productivity. OECD Manual, 25-65.
Schreyer, P Matilde M . (2013). An International Perspective.” In Measuring and Modeling Health Care Costs. Measuring Health Services in the National Accounts.-Д University of Chicago Press.
Schreyer, P. ( 2010). Towards Measuring the Volume Output of Education and Health Services. OECD Statistics Working Papers 2010/02.
Singh, H., Motwani, J. and Kumar, A. . ( 2000). A review and analysis of the state-of-the-art research on productivity measurement. Industrial Management and Data Systems 100(5), 234-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570010335271
Statistics, O. f. (2012). Quality adjustment of public service output: current method. London: Office for National Statistics.
Sumanth, D. (1984). Productivity Engineering and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.
Susan, H. W. (2007). Outsourcing, Offshoring, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Manufacturing. . International Labour Review, 146(1-2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2007.00005.x
Tangen, S. (2005). Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510571437
Triplett, Jack E. (2011). Health System Productivity. Oxford Handbook of Health Economic (хуудсд. 707-32).-Д New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238828.013.0030
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dorjkhuu Otgontuya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any research article in the Mongolian Geoscientist is retained by the author(s).
The authors grant the Mongolian Journal of Economic Review a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Articles in the Mongolian Journal of Economic Review are Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-NODERIVS 4.0 INTERNATIONAL - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
